loomisdairy wrote:Tim, no disrespect you do a good job just not grasping your choice of pulled post versus ones that are allowed to stay.
Oh, no disrespect taken! I totally understand your point, and the gist of it is this: I receive a complaint about a post, I look at the post and if it seems to cross a line then I pull it. And there have been times that when I pulled one post, I went back through the thread and pulled others at the same time, even if they weren't directly complained about. But that has been an imperfect science, for sure.
I know that this has been a far from perfect, and possibly (probably?) unfair way of doing this because I know some are overlooked and others aren't, but I do have a limited amount of bandwidth during the day so I have to rely on other people's eyes on the postings.
And szigeti: I guess I could, but then I start to squirm a bit because I don't want to be the "moral judge" of the forums - the last thing I want to do is PM people saying "Watch your tone please". Seems to me that that could piss people off right quick. How about this: if I pull a post, I'll PM the author to let you know why I pulled it. Would that work?
And DG1 - watch your tone please