Natural Gas Is Clean, It’s Now & Doesn’t Need Our Subsidies

Natural Gas Is Clean, It’s Now & Doesn’t Need Our Subsidies

Postby TShepstone » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:19 am

Natural Gas Is Clean, It’s Now and It Doesn’t Need Our Subsidies

If we truly want to reduce carbon emissions and make the biggest possible environmental difference right now at the least cost, the answer is natural gas.

http://naturalgasnow.org/natural-gas-cl ... subsidies/
TShepstone
 
Posts: 3006
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Natural Gas Is Clean, It’s Now & Doesn’t Need Our Subsid

Postby chasgas » Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:11 pm

It Doesn’t Need Our Subsidies :lol: :lol: :roll: :roll: :lol: :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol: :roll: :roll:

here's a post from a landman that works in several oil patches:

The oil and gas industry is about the most heavily subsidized industry in the country and has been for decades. It is also worth reminding members from time to time that horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracture stimulation technology benefited from significant subsidies from the federal government when even industry critics said it was a waste. There were critics of those federal subsidies back in the day just as there are critics of subsidies for renewables today.

When it comes to tax-advantaged investments for wealthy or sophisticated investors, one investment class continues to stand alone above all others: oil. With the U.S. government's backing, domestic energy production has created a litany of tax incentives for both investors and small producers.

Several major tax benefits are available for oil and gas investors that are found nowhere else in the tax code.



Intangible Drilling Costs: These include everything but the actual drilling equipment. Labor, chemicals, mud, grease and other miscellaneous items necessary for drilling are considered intangible. These expenses generally constitute 65-80% of the total cost of drilling a well and are 100% deductible in the year incurred. For example, if it costs $300,000 to drill a well, and if it was determined that 75% of that cost would be considered intangible, the investor would receive a current deduction of $225,000. Furthermore, it doesn't matter whether the well actually produces or even strikes oil. As long as it starts to operate by March 31 of the following year, the deductions will be allowed.
Tangible Drilling Costs: Tangible costs pertain to the actual direct cost of the drilling equipment. These expenses are also 100% deductible but must be depreciated over seven years. Therefore, in the example above, the remaining $75,000 could be written off according to a seven-year schedule.
Active vs. Passive Income: The tax code specifies that a working interest (as opposed to a royalty interest) in an oil and gas well is not considered to be a passive activity. This means that all net losses are active income incurred in conjunction with well-head production and can be offset against other forms of income such as wages, interest and capital gains.
Small Producer Tax Exemptions: This is perhaps the most enticing tax break for small producers and investors. This incentive, which is commonly known as the "depletion allowance," excludes from taxation 15% of all gross income from oil and gas wells. This special advantage is limited solely to small companies and investors. Any company that produces or refines more than 50,000 barrels of oil per day is ineligible. Entities that own more than 1,000 barrels of oil per day, or 6 million cubic feet of gas per day, are excluded as well.
Lease Costs: These include the purchase of lease and mineral rights, lease operating costs and all administrative, legal and accounting expenses. These expenses must be capitalized and deducted over the life of the lease via the depletion allowance.
Alternative Minimum Tax: All excess intangible drilling costs have been specifically exempted as a "preference item" on the alternative minimum tax return.

Read more: Oil: A Big Investment With Big Tax Breaks http://www.investopedia.com/articles/07 ... z4e8bwdcYM


chasgas

tom, you're as extreme as any anti..........................
chasgas
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: Natural Gas Is Clean, It’s Now & Doesn’t Need Our Subsid

Postby chasgas » Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:20 pm

As of July 2014, Oil Change International estimates United States fossil fuel subsidies at $37.5 billion annually, including $21 billion in production and exploration subsidies. Other credible estimates of annual United States fossil fuel subsidies range from $10 billion to $52 billion annually – yet none of these include costs borne by taxpayers related to the climate, local environmental, and health impacts of the fossil fuel industry.

Fossil fuel subsidies in the United States also include massive military expenditures to acquire and defend fossil fuel interests around the globe, and infrastructure spending and related maintenance based on an antiquated energy system built on large, remote power plants and cheap electricity.

We Can Do Better Than This
Right now, we’re subsidizing deadly behavior. But we can do better.

Through 2013, fossil fuel subsidies linked to production actually increased under President Barack Obama’s administration, largely as a result of an “All of the Above” energy strategy promoting oil and gas industry expansion. At a federal level, production and exploration subsidies – some of the most inefficient and least defensible subsidies – rose from $12.5 billion in 2009 to $18.5 billion in 2013.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... 7Uz5WOlNvQ

chasgas
chasgas
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:36 pm


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests